Unexplainable
Unexplainable

An argument for the sun

July 27, 2026

AI Summary

5 min read

In the 1920s, people hung UV lamps over their children's cribs to irradiate them as they slept, believing it was a health cure. A century later, we are told to never go outside without sunscreen. Rowan Jacobson, author of The Sun and the Body, argues that both extremes miss something essential: sunlight is a physical force that interacts with our bodies in ways science is only beginning to understand, and our modern indoor lives may be far more dangerous than a little sun exposure.

The Pendulum of Sunlight: From Heliotherapy to Fear

For most of history, the idea that sunlight was bad for you would have seemed strange. This changed dramatically in the early 20th century with the rise of heliotherapy. Doctors discovered that sunlight could cure two major industrial-age diseases: rickets (a lack of vitamin D causing soft bones) and tuberculosis (specifically the skin-infecting form). The success was real, but it led to excess. Sanitariums in the Alps and California promoted the "outdoor cure," and companies like General Electric sold UV lamps for home use. The pendulum had swung to "sun is good for everything."

Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.

Read Full Summary →

Free • No credit card required

What you'll learn

  • 1 Main Outline
  • 2 (01:06) **Rowan Jacobson's Changed Relationship with the Sun** - The host introduces the premise: after researching his book *Ingrams of Sunlight*, Rowan Jacobson now sees light as a physical force interacting with the body
  • 3 (04:21) **The Heliotherapy Era: When Sun Was Medicine** - Tracing the historical period from the 1800s to the 1920s when sunlight was prescribed as a cure
  • 4 (07:17) **What Heliotherapy Actually Got Right** - The legitimate benefits that modern science now confirms
  • 5 (08:33) **Discovery of Sun's Cancer Risk and Public Messaging** - How the 1980s pivot changed sun-related behavior
  • 6 (11:12) **The Swedish Obstetrician's Puzzle** - Dr. Pele Lindqvist's unexpected findings about sun exposure and mortality
  • 7 (13:07) **The Controversial Smoking Comparison** - Why Lindqvist's findings upset the public health establishment

+ Full timestamped outline available in the app

Show Notes

It can be hard to know how to interact with the sun. Some people have swung to opposite ends of the spectrum — either over-tanning or avoiding the sun entirely. But what would a middle ground look like?

Guest: Rowan Jacobsen, author of In Defense of Sunlight


For show transcripts, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠vox.com/unxtranscripts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
For more, go to ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠vox.com/unexplainable⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
And please email us! ⁠⁠⁠[email protected]⁠⁠⁠
We read every email.
Support Unexplainable (and get ad-free episodes) by becoming a Vox Member today: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠vox.com/members⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
Thank you!

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Unexplainable

More from this podcast

Unexplainable →