Hall of Fame: Throwing Stones, Winning the Vote and Changing Women's History
September 15, 2025
AI Summary
5 min readHall of Fame: Throwing Stones, Winning the Vote and Changing Women's History
The historian Helen Lewis, author of Difficult Women, nominates Constance Bulwer-Lytton for the Trapped History Hall of Fame — a suffragette whose story she found "profoundly affecting and moving" while researching her book. Bulwer-Lytton was an actual aristocrat, which set her apart from the mostly upper-middle-class women who made up the suffragette movement. She came to militancy slowly, initially a non-violent suffragist who found the Women's Social and Political Union too extreme. But she eventually became radicalized, taking part in suffragette actions and going to prison.
The experiment that proved a point
Bulwer-Lytton had a theory: the Home Office and prison service would treat an aristocrat far better than a working-class woman. To test it, she adopted a fake persona, complete with costume, and got herself arrested for throwing stones under an assumed name. The authorities were indeed "really horrible to her." Eventually someone discovered her real identity and she was released — but by then she was so thin she "had to sit down on cushions because her knees were so bony." She had been force-fed in a manner that Lewis says "now would be recognized as torture."
Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.
Read Full Summary →Free • No credit card required
Never miss an episode of Trapped History
Get every new episode summarized in your inbox — free, ~5 minutes to read.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What you'll learn
- 1 (00:01) **Hall of Fame Nomination: Constance Bulwer-Litton** - Guest nominates the suffragette Constance Bulwer-Litton for the Trapped History Hall of Fame, framing her as a forgotten figure who sacrificed her health for the cause.
- 2 (01:26) **The Mechanism: Force-Feeding and a Deliberate Experiment** - Details her arrest, hunger strike, and brutal force-feeding, which she used to expose systemic mistreatment.
- 3 (02:45) **The Evidence: Physical Cost on the Page** - Guest describes the visceral evidence of her sacrifice found in her personal letters.
- 4 (03:53) **Broader Implications: Cross-Class Unity and Moral Complexity** - Guest discusses the WSPU's cross-class and cross-racial coalition, and the moral questions around political violence.
- 5 Standout Quotes
- 6 (03:18) "This was somebody who had been so brave, uh standing up for what she believed in, and it was there on the page that I could see the physical cost, you know."
- 7 (06:58) "If people in a hundred and fifty years' time are looking back from a scorched earth, they will be much more, I think, susceptible to the idea that extinction rebellion were right to block the M25."
+ Full timestamped outline available in the app
Guests on this episode
Show Notes
Join us for Helen Lewis' nominee for the Trapped History Hall of Fame: Constance Bulwer-Lytton, daughter of a Viceroy, sister to an Earl – but one of the bravest suffragettes of them all.
In changing women's history, she was imprisoned four times for campaigning for the vote, carved "V" for votes on her breast, went on hunger strike and was force-fed by prison guards.
In Constance's own words, which can stand for so much political action:
"People say, what does this hunger strike mean? Surely it is all folly. If it is not hysteria, at least it is unreasonable. They will not realise that we are like an army, that we are deputed to fight for a cause, and for other people, and in any struggle or any fight, weapons must be used . . . These women have chosen the weapon of self-hurt to make their protest, and this hunger strike . . . involves grave hurt and tremendous sacrifice, but this is on the part of the women only, and does not physically injure their enemies. Can that be called violence and hooliganism?"
Constance celebrated women winning the vote in 1918, a milestone in women's history – but she did not live to see women wield the vote in true equality with men. Because it was only at the 1929 general election that men and women aged 21 and over entered the voting booth as equals. But Constance, fatally weakened by her treatment in prison, had already died six years earlier in 1923, at the age of 54.
Hers was a bright short life in women's history: forgotten, unsung and hidden – but it is one captured beautifully by Helen here.
More from this podcast
Trapped History →