Why Markets Don't Panic Anymore + How to Build Real Relationships at Work
May 13, 2026
AI Summary
5 min read“Algorithmic trading accounts for roughly 60 to 75 percent of total trading volume,” Scott Galloway says, citing a shift that has fundamentally changed how markets behave. The S&P 500 keeps hitting all-time highs despite pandemics, tariffs, wars, and political chaos — and the question from a Reddit user named previous_golf_95-41 is whether advances in electronic trading tech are modulating reactive trading. Galloway’s answer is a cautious “maybe,” but he spends the rest of the segment unpacking what that actually means for investors, before pivoting to a second question about introversion at work and a third about the real ROI of city living.
Why Markets Don’t Panic the Way They Used To
Galloway starts with a warning: “It’s always dangerous to think it’s different this time.” He recalls the late 1990s, when the NASDAQ surged past any rational number and the Wall Street Journal floated the idea that valuations had been fundamentally re-priced — only for 2000 to prove otherwise. Still, he acknowledges that the market’s composition has changed. Algorithmic trading grew from about 15 percent of U.S. equity volume in 2003 to over 70 percent by 2010, and has since plateaued around 70 to 80 percent. “If you think you’re a stock picker,” Galloway says, “just keep in mind you’re competing against an algorithm that looks at millions of points of data designed by a ton of PhDs.”
Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.
Read Full Summary →Free • No credit card required
Never miss an episode of The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
Get every new episode summarized in your inbox — free, ~5 minutes to read.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What you'll learn
- 1 (03:17) **Market Resilience: Is It Different This Time?** - Scott responds to a Reddit question about whether algorithmic trading is dampening market volatility and making traditional panic dynamics obsolete.
- 2 (06:09) **The Limits of Algorithms: Flash Crashes and Feedback Loops** - Scott explains the research on whether algorithms actually reduce volatility, and where they fail.
- 3 (07:13) **Practical Advice: Diversify, Don't Stock-Pick** - Scott gives concrete portfolio advice for the individual investor in an algorithm-dominated market.
- 4 (08:53) **The SP 500 Is No Longer an Index Fund** - Scott warns that the S&P 500 is now heavily concentrated in big tech, requiring a different diversification strategy.
- 5 (10:34) **Building Relationships at Work as an Introvert** - Scott answers Daniel's question about how to connect with senior leaders when you struggle with social anxiety and small talk.
- 6 (13:04) **Let Your Work Speak, and Mentor Down** - Scott offers specific strategies for introverts to build credibility and relationships without forced banter.
- 7 (19:44) **Should You Move to a City If You're Not Wealthy?** - Scott responds to a question squaring his advice to be in a city with the high cost of living that makes it tough for non-wealthy people.
+ Full timestamped outline available in the app
Guests on this episode
Show Notes
Scott Galloway explains why algorithmic and passive investing have changed how markets respond to crises (and why that's not entirely reassuring), offers practical advice for introverts building relationships with senior leaders, and makes the case that city living is still worth it — but only if you do it young.
Want to be featured in a future episode? Send a voice recording to [email protected], or drop your question in the r/ScottGalloway subreddit.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
More from this podcast
The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway →