AI Summary
5 min readOn June 23, 2016, Britons voted to leave the European Union by 52% to 48%. Ten years later, The Economist revisits the referendum that was supposed to settle the European question for a generation. Instead, it launched a decade of political instability, economic friction, and national soul-searching. The episode traces how a promise to "take back control" led to a country that has cycled through seven prime ministers, seen its manufacturing exports to the EU shrink by 17%, and still cannot agree on what Brexit was supposed to achieve.
The referendum that was never meant to happen
The real starting gun for Brexit was a January 2013 speech by then-Prime Minister David Cameron, who promised a referendum to settle a festering argument inside his Conservative Party. The Economist supported the decision at the time, accepting the logic that a vote would "settle the issue for a generation." But Cameron himself called it a bad idea, saying Britain's national interest was best served inside a flexible, open European Union.
Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.
Read Full Summary →Free • No credit card required
Never miss an episode of The Intelligence from The Economist
Get every new episode summarized in your inbox — free, ~5 minutes to read.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What you'll learn
- 1 (01:01) **Introduction: A Decade After the Brexit Vote** - Host Rosie Blore sets up the episode: ten years on from the 2016 referendum, how have predictions fared, and where does Britain go from here?
- 2 (02:22) **The Political Fallout: Seven Prime Ministers in a Decade** - Senior editor Daniel Franklin argues Brexit has made governing Britain much harder, contributing to the rapid turnover of leaders.
- 3 (03:16) **Remembering the Shock of the Result** - Daniel and Rosie recall their personal memories of the night of the referendum and the sense of disbelief.
- 4 (04:11) **The Economist's Stance and the Road to the Referendum** - The Economist supported a referendum to settle the issue, but warned it was a bad idea at a bad moment.
- 5 (07:42) **The Campaign: Momentum, Misinformation, and a Fractured Electorate** - The Leave campaign gained momentum with a message of change, while Remain was complacent.
- 6 (11:17) **After the Vote: "Brexit Means Brexit" and a Hard Exit** - Theresa May took over, followed by Boris Johnson, who delivered a "hard Brexit" in 2020.
- 7 (12:36) **The Economic Damage: A Series of Little Hurts** - Britain economics correspondent Tom Carter details the negative economic impact, with GDP shaved by 2.5% to 8%.
+ Full timestamped outline available in the app
Guests on this episode
Show Notes
On June 23rd 2016, Britain voted to leave the European Union, triggering years of argument, lost economic opportunities and political malaise. Our correspondents look back on the seismic moment and its aftershocks. And, as Britain prepares to get its seventh prime minister in a decade, we ask how the government can look forward to new opportunities.
Guests and host:
- Daniel Franklin, senior editor
- John Peet, associate editor
- Tom Carter, Britain economics correspondent
- Georgia Banjo, Britain correspondent
- Rosie Blau, co-host of “The intelligence”
- Jason Palmer, co-host of “The intelligence”
Topics covered:
- Brexit, European Union, EU
- David Cameron, Boris Johnson, Andy Burnham
- AI, defence
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
More from this podcast
The Intelligence from The Economist →