AI Summary
5 min readIn 2024, the United Nations finalized a new treaty against cybercrime. The stated goal—international cooperation to fight hacking, phishing, and online fraud—is one most people support. But as Sarah McLaughlin, a senior scholar at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, explains, the treaty defines its target not as specific technical crimes but as any offense punishable by four or more years in prison. Because billions of people around the world can already receive prison sentences of that length for peacefully expressing themselves online, the treaty effectively creates a global infrastructure for governments to request each other's help in silencing critics. And a wave of national "cybercrime" bills passed in 2026—in Malaysia, Namibia, South Sudan, Iraq, and China—shows exactly how the label is being used to crack down on satire, adult content, "misinformation," and political dissent.
How the UN Treaty Works (and Why It Is So Broad)
Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.
Read Full Summary →Free • No credit card required
Never miss an episode of Taylor Lorenz’s Power User
Get every new episode summarized in your inbox — free, ~5 minutes to read.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What you'll learn
- 1 (02:01) **Episode Introduction: The Cybercrime Trojan Horse** - Taylor Lorenz introduces the episode’s core thesis: governments are hiding censorship inside cybercrime laws, and a new UN treaty could globalize this infrastructure.
- 2 (03:48) **The UN Cybercrime Convention: How It Works** - Sarah explains the treaty’s structure and why its broad definition of “serious crime” is the central danger.
- 3 (05:36) **Origins of the Treaty: From Budapest to the UN** - Sarah traces the treaty’s history from the 2001 Budapest Convention to the current push led by Russia, China, and Iran starting in 2019.
- 4 (07:58) **The Thailand Example: How It Works in Practice** - Sarah uses a concrete hypothetical to show how the treaty could be weaponized against political speech.
- 5 (11:30) **Who Has Signed On? A Broad Spectrum of Nations** - Taylor asks whether only authoritarian countries are signing on, and Sarah reveals a concerningly wide range.
- 6 (13:40) **Malaysia’s 2026 Cybercrime Bill: Targeting AI-Generated Speech** - Sarah walks through the first specific example of a modern cybercrime bill that hides speech restrictions.
- 7 (17:33) **Namibia’s Cybercrime Bill: “Cyberbullying” as a Weapon** - Sarah explains how a vaguely defined term like cyberbullying is used to silence government critics.
+ Full timestamped outline available in the app
Show Notes
The New Global Plan To Control What You Post
SUPPORT MY WORK:
Buy a paid subscription to my newsletter at https://www.usermag.co
Support my work on Patreon: http://patreon.com/taylorlorenz
A new United Nations cybercrime treaty is being sold as a way for governments to fight hacking, phishing, and online fraud. But its sweeping language could also help countries identify anonymous users, obtain data from technology companies, and punish political speech across national borders.
In this episode of Free Speech Friday, I speak with Sarah McLaughlin, senior scholar of global expression at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, about the UN Convention against Cybercrime and the growing number of governments hiding censorship powers inside cybercrime legislation.
We discuss how online satire, criticism of government officials, adult content, AI-generated images, and so-called misinformation could be treated as serious crimes carrying years in prison. We also examine new and proposed cybercrime laws in Malaysia, Namibia, China, South Sudan, and more, and how authoritarian governments could use international data-sharing systems to pursue political critics.
Cybercrime is real. But when governments define ordinary online speech as "cybercrime," laws created to catch hackers will become tools for censorship, surveillance, and the destruction of online anonymity.
More from this podcast
Taylor Lorenz’s Power User →