Science Friday
Science Friday

Did the COVID pandemic stunt kids’ development?

September 29, 2026

AI Summary

5 min read

In a special issue of the Journal of Child Development, 17 new studies across six countries examined whether the pandemic set kids back emotionally, developmentally, and academically. The results are more nuanced than the hand-wringing of PTA meetings might suggest. Dr. Anna Johnson of Georgetown University, who helped compile the issue, summarizes the top-level finding: “Mostly, yeah.” The kids are mostly okay. But that “mostly” hides important variation, particularly in two areas—executive function and math—where the pandemic’s impact was real and measurable.

Why the early panic was misleading

The popular narrative that kids’ development took a severe hit came from two kinds of early-pandemic data. First, quick-response surveys fielded in the throes of lockdowns showed parents stressed, household conflict rising, and children acting out or showing signs of withdrawal. Second, test score data like the 2022 NAEP report card showed fourth graders behind their 2019 peers. Both were real findings, but they had a critical limitation: they were snapshots. The surveys captured a single point in time, and the test scores compared two different groups of children—one that experienced the pandemic and one that did not. As Johnson explains, without knowing how those exact kids were doing before the pandemic, it is impossible to tell whether COVID introduced new problems or simply

Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.

Read Full Summary →

Free • No credit card required

What you'll learn

  • 1 (01:29) **Episode Introduction** - Host sets up the central question: Did the pandemic set kids back emotionally, developmentally, and academically?
  • 2 (02:49) **Top-Line Answer: "Mostly Yes, the Kids Are Okay"** - Dr. Johnson gives the optimistic overview of the findings.
  • 3 (04:19) **Why the Public Narrative Was So Negative** - Dr. Johnson explains how early pandemic research and test score data created a bleaker picture.
  • 4 (06:19) **Defining Executive Function** - Dr. Jones explains what executive function is and why it matters for young children.
  • 5 (08:02) **The Stunning Drop in Executive Function** - Dr. Jones reveals the key finding from her longitudinal study of Massachusetts children.
  • 6 (11:15) **Squaring the Optimism with the Executive Function Data** - Dr. Johnson contextualizes the severe executive function findings within the broader hopeful picture.
  • 7 (15:10) **The Screen Time Complication** - The host asks about screens, which are known to impact executive function.

+ Full timestamped outline available in the app

Show Notes

It’s a conversation at playgrounds and in classrooms: parents and teachers worry that kids who spent formative years at home during the COVID-19 pandemic are set back, emotionally, socially or academically. But what does science say? Did stay-at-home life permanently impact kids who lived through it? Joining host Flora Lichtman to dig into the research are child development experts Anna Johnson and Stephanie Jones. 

Guests:

Dr. Anna Johnson, Professor of Psychology at Georgetown University in Washington D.C.


Dr. Stephanie Jones, Professor of Early Childhood Development at the Harvard Graduate School of Education in Cambridge, Massachusetts.


Transcripts for each episode are available within 1-3 days at sciencefriday.com.

Subscribe to this podcast. Follow our show on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and Bluesky @scifri and sign up for our newsletters. Got a science question that’s keeping you up at night? Call us: 877-472-4374


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Science Friday

More from this podcast

Science Friday →