Orthodox Conundrum
Orthodox Conundrum

Turning Criminals Into Heroes: Rabbi Jeremy Wieder on Rubashkin, Pollard, and Moral Clarity (275)

January 5, 2026

AI Summary

5 min read

Turning Criminals Into Heroes: Rabbi Jeremy Wieder on Rubashkin, Pollard, and Moral Clarity

In a recent Mishpacha magazine profile, Shalom Rubashkin was described as "the Emunah and Bitachon Rebbe of the entire Jewish world"—a man whose eight years in prison on a twenty-seven-year sentence had somehow transformed him into a spiritual authority. But as Rabbi Jeremy Wieder points out, the evidence presented at trial tells a different story: Rubashkin inflated sales to fraudulently obtain millions in loans, diverted customer payments, laundered money through a grocery store and religious school, and personally inspected fabricated IDs for undocumented workers. The sentence was unduly harsh and involved government overreach. But that is not the same as innocence, and it is certainly not a basis for turning a convicted criminal into a moral teacher.

The Psychology of False Heroes

Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.

Read Full Summary →

Free • No credit card required

What you'll learn

  • 1 (06:02) **Introducing Rabbi Jeremy Wieder and the Problem of False Heroes** - Rabbi Jeremy Wieder, a RIETS Rosh Yeshiva at YU, joins host Scott Kahn to dissect the pattern of elevating convicted criminals to hero status in the Orthodox world.
  • 2 (09:15) **Heroism vs. Suffering: The Core Distinction** - Wieder defines a hero as someone who resists temptation, not someone who commits crimes and then suffers punishment.
  • 3 (12:14) **The Jonathan Pollard Case: Betrayal and Motivation** - Wieder explains why Pollard, often lionized as a Zionist hero, does not fit that mold.
  • 4 (14:34) **The Missing Ingredient: Viduy (Confession)** - The crucial element missing in these cases is a genuine acknowledgment of wrongdoing, which is the first step of *teshuvah*.
  • 5 (19:02) **The Psychology of Denial: "Team Psychology" and Complexity** - The need to deny wrongdoing stems from a "team psychology" where the group sees itself as an outsider and cannot handle the complexity of a flawed member.
  • 6 (22:21) **Does Hero-Worship Normalize Unethical Behavior?** - Kahn asks if turning criminals into heroes normalizes unethical behavior, especially when directed at the government.
  • 7 (26:19) **The Complicated Path of Teshuvah for Public Figures** - The conversation shifts to what should be done with a person who *does* publicly repent for a crime.

+ Full timestamped outline available in the app

Show Notes

Check out Orthodox Conundrum Commentary on Substack and get your free subscription by going to https://scottkahn.substack.com/ - and paid subscribers get this and other episodes of the Orthodox Conundrum Podcast ad-free and with additional bonus content!

There's a recurring pattern in parts of the Orthodox world - one that has always troubled me, but in recent years has become impossible to ignore. We take individuals who have committed serious wrongdoing, sometimes admitted it in court, sometimes even served jail time, and we nevertheless elevate them to the status of heroes - not necessarily despite their criminal behavior, but in some ways almost because of it.

Just a couple of weeks ago, Mishpacha magazine ran a glowing feature calling Sholom Rubashkin "the emunah and bitachon rebbe of the entire Jewish world," as though the only relevant fact of his story is his early release from prison.

But as the record makes clear, including extensive evidence presented at trial, Rubashkin was involved in significant fraud, money laundering, and the exploitation of undocumented workers. Was his sentence excessive and unfair? Absolutely. Was there government overreach? No question. But that's not the same thing as innocence, and certainly not a basis for turning someone into a moral authority.

Let me be clear: many of us have done things that we're not proud of, and that we wish we had done differently. The fact that Rubashkin went to jail is not the issue, so much as the fact that despite the real evidence, much of the Orthodox world treats him as if he were an innocent man who did nothing wrong, rather than an example of someone who was both perpetrator and victim. If he presented himself as an example of a baal teshuva, I would have no complaint. I would be pleased and fully supportive if we looked at him as someone who committed crimes, but has repented and is now living an honest life. And if he acknowledged his conviction as just and also complained about government overreach, he would be in the right. But that's not what's happening - and the consequences for the Orthodox self-image and behavior are serious.

And this is not just a Haredi phenomenon. In the Modern Orthodox world, Jonathan Pollard has long been held up as a heroic defender of Israel. But as Rabbi Jeremy Wieder points out in our conversation, Pollard betrayed the country of which he was a citizen, took large sums of money for his actions, and passed along intelligence, the scope of which none of us fully know. The fact that the U.S. government mishandled his sentencing - which is terrible - does not magically transform espionage into idealism.

So why do we do this?

Why does our community repeatedly turn criminals into role models—sometimes even into teachers of faith and morality?

What psycho

Orthodox Conundrum

More from this podcast

Orthodox Conundrum →