AI Summary
5 min readIn January, New York Times religion correspondent Elizabeth Dias broke the story that Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude language model, had been secretly convening religious leaders—priests, rabbis, and other spiritual thinkers—to ask them two enormous questions: Is Claude conscious? And how do we teach it to be morally good? Dias’s reporting, discussed on the Hard Fork podcast alongside tech reporter Aaron Griffith and opinion writer David Wallace-Wells, pulls back the curtain on a company that is not just building a product but wrestling with whether it has built something that might deserve moral consideration—and what to do about that.
The Secret Summits and the Search for an "Adult in the Room"
Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.
Read Full Summary →Free • No credit card required
Never miss an episode of Hard Fork
Get every new episode summarized in your inbox — free, ~5 minutes to read.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What you'll learn
- 1 (00:36) **Anthropic’s Existential Questions** - The episode introduces Anthropic as the most anxious AI company, facing a $2 trillion IPO while privately asking whether Claude is conscious, feels pain, or has a soul, and whether it can be taught morals.
- 2 (05:23) **How the Story Broke** - Elizabeth Dyas explains how she learned about Anthropic’s secret summits with religious thinkers from around the world, held under NDAs to discuss AI consciousness and moral formation.
- 3 (07:07) **Anthropic’s Two-Pronged Goal** - The company’s engagement with religious leaders evolved from a bridge-building effort to a deeper project of learning how to raise a moral AI, though it’s unclear how the results will be used.
- 4 (09:09) **The Consciousness Debate on the Ground** - The religious thinkers were divided, with some buying into the idea of Claude’s potential consciousness and others opening up after the meetings, while Anthropic remained careful to express uncertainty.
- 5 (11:31) **The NDA Controversy** - The panel discusses the secretive nature of the meetings, with David Wallace-Wells noting the irony of holding a summit on critical societal ideas under NDAs.
- 6 (13:20) **A Rabbi’s Challenge and the Pope’s Opposition** - David Wallace-Wells highlights two moments that alienated him from Chris Olah’s worldview: a rabbi’s critique that conscious LLMs would mean running slave plantations, and Olah’s horror at the Pope’s encyclical rejecting machine consciousness.
- 7 (15:24) **Two Inner Sanctums: Vatican and Silicon Valley** - Elizabeth Dyas describes the clash between the Catholic Church’s centuries of philosophy and the new quasi-religious system being built in real time at Anthropic.
+ Full timestamped outline available in the app
Guests on this episode
Show Notes
This week, Max Read talks to the Times religion correspondent Elizabeth Dias, the tech reporter Erin Griffith and the opinion writer David Wallace-Wells about Anthropic’s private meetings with religious scholars on A.I. consciousness and how to make Claude “good,” its differences with the Vatican and the new belief systems taking shape in Silicon Valley.
Panelists:
- Elizabeth Dias, national religion correspondent for The New York Times.
- Erin Griffith, a tech reporter for The New York Times.
- David Wallace-Wells, an opinion writer for The New York Times.
Additional Reading:
- Religious Scholars Met With Anthropic. What They Heard Stunned Them.
- What Would You Do If Your Employer Could Destroy the World? Exit interviews with defectors from OpenAI, Anthropic and DeepMind.
- I Quit OpenAI Because Its Culture Is Broken
We want to hear from you. Email us at [email protected]. Find “Hard Fork” on YouTube and TikTok.
Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Amazon Music. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher. For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
More from this podcast
Hard Fork →