AI Summary
5 min readThe six researchers from the Ethereum Foundation who proposed EIP stake tapering did not expect the firestorm it ignited. The proposal, introduced days before a key meeting for inclusion in the next hard fork, aims to cap the incentive to stake more ETH by reducing issuance as the staked percentage approaches 50%. The stated goal is to preserve "vanilla ether" and prevent the entire supply from being locked into liquid staking derivatives like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH. But Stani Kulechov of Aave and Mike Silagadze of EtherFi argue the proposal would destroy the DeFi economy that actually makes Ethereum valuable.
The mechanism that would break DeFi
The core mechanism of stake tapering is straightforward: as more ETH gets staked, the yield per staker drops, approaching zero near the 50% target. The researchers argue Ethereum is "overpaying for security" and that 30-40% staked provides ample protection. But Kulechov and Silagadze see this as fundamentally misunderstanding how Ethereum's economy works.
Continue reading the full summary in the app — free to try.
Read Full Summary →Free • No credit card required
Never miss an episode of Bankless
Get every new episode summarized in your inbox — free, ~5 minutes to read.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
What you'll learn
- 1 (00:25) **EIP Introduced: Stake Targeting / ETH Issuance Debate** - The episode opens by framing the new EIP, which aims to constrain ETH staking because there’s no cap on the incentive to stake more, with the worry that vanilla ETH will be replaced by staked derivatives and that Ethereum is overpaying for security.
- 2 (02:47) **Stani’s First Reaction: Legitimate Question, Wrong Solution** - Stani acknowledges the question of overpaying for security is legitimate, but argues the real objective is to boost ETH price, and the proposal’s consequences are negative.
- 3 (07:56) **Mike’s First Reaction: Frustrating on Every Level** - Mike calls the proposal frustrating, noting it was rushed in last-minute and hurts solo stakers (who have the highest cost basis) by pushing yields below breakeven.
- 4 (14:43) **The Core Question: What Would Happen to DeFi?** - The hosts dive into the second/third/fourth order consequences of zero yield as staking approaches 50%.
- 5 (17:19) **Stani Elaborates: Removing Productivity Turns ETH into a Funding Leg** - Stani explains that without the yield component, ETH holders will move to stablecoin yields, and ETH becomes a cheap asset to borrow and sell for more productive assets.
- 6 (24:57) **The “Noble But Naive” Argument for Preserving Vanilla ETH** - The host, David, plays devil’s advocate, praising the idea of preserving vanilla ETH so users don’t have to use intermediaries (LSTs), which is very self-sovereign and Bitcoin-like.
- 7 (27:25) **Mike’s Counter: Sophisticated Economies Need Derivatives** - Mike pushes back hard, saying the “only true ETH is raw ETH” mindset is a Bitcoin brainworm that doesn’t understand real economies.
+ Full timestamped outline available in the app
Show Notes
Ethereum’s latest staking proposal is sparking backlash across DeFi. Aave founder Stani Kulechov and EtherFi CEO Mike Silagadze join David to break down why stake tapering could push ETH yield toward zero, weaken solo staking, drive capital out of DeFi, and make ETH less attractive to institutions. They debate Ethereum’s monetary policy, whether the network is overpaying for security, and why trying to make ETH more like Bitcoin could undermine what makes Ethereum valuable in the first place. Subscribe for more conversations from the frontier of crypto.
---
📣SPOTIFY PREMIUM RSS FEED | USE CODE: SPOTIFY24
https://bankless.cc/spotify-premium
---
BANKLESS SPONSOR TOOLS:
🔓NEAR | TRADE CONFIDENTIALLY, GET 20% BACK
🔑BITKEY | GET 10% OFF USE CODE: BANKLESS | #bitkeypartner
✈️COINBASE ONE CARD | EARN 5% BACK IN BITCOIN
https://bankless.cc/coinbase-one-card
📊BITGET | TOKENIZED STOCKS 2.0
https://bankless.cc/bitget-stocks
🎯THE DEFI REPORT | ONCHAIN INSIGHTS
https://thedefireport.io/bankless
---
TIMESTAMPS
Intro 0:00
0:09 Ethereum’s Staking Debate
2:41 Stani’s First Reaction
7:48 Mike’s Centralization Concerns
14:37 DeFi Under Pressure
17:15 Stani on Yield and Cash Flow
24:54 The Case for Vanilla Ether
27:20 Mike Pushes Back
34:27 Issuance and Monetary Policy
35:16 Minimum Viable Issuance
40:47 Institutions Need
More from this podcast
Bankless →